 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calgary & Edmonton
| Topic: Tuesday Jan 12 DYP Results and Point Update |
| ||
|
Last night we did a DYP with 16 players. It was nice to see some new faces out and overall the event went really well. One thing that is certain, when Shane is on like he was last night it is incredible to watch. Sam and I had a blast watching the final together, and with the vast array of what most people would call trick shots just work together to find holes in any defense. You can't mention Shane without mentioning Tobin, as they won the DYP together... Tobin turned into a brick wall in the last few games and made a crucial pass 2-3 in the final game. Shane and Tobin came through the losers bracket but double dipped Garry and Roger to take the title and the cash. Garry and Roger were the favorite to win from the time the draw was finished. In the kingseat game they played against myself and Dallyn. Dallyn played great in the game, and entire tourney, but even with his multiple blocks and great clearing I just couldn't get enough possesions to win the game. Garry had a great defensive 5 and Roger wouldn't let anything come out of his zone off the back wall. Great playing by both guys and they deserved the win in that game. Also worth mentioning is Jasmine and Dallyn winning the No-Pro game, it was nice to see them win some cash and you can see they have been playing a bunch of foos lately. I love seeing the look on players faces the first time Jasmine hits a roller at them. Results: 1st: 40 Tobin and Shane 2nd: 25 Garry and Roger 3rd: 15 Will and Dallyn No Pro: 20 Dallyn and Jasmine Points Update: Dunn, Christian 1356 Stranks, Will 1249 Penner, Roger 1244 Lawrence, Shane 1197 McDonald, Tom 1152 Edwards, Simon 1100 Burgardt, Garry 1097 Wilkins, Ben 1072 Luft, Carey 1012 Rupertus, Lindsey 1011 So, Albert 1002 Demelo, Ivor 997 Schnieder, Jeff 973 Dick, Matt 968 Goodman, Eric 964 Campbell, Lance 957 Kippen, Rick 956 Smithson, Justin 954 Karmis, Pete 954 Karmis, Ang 954 Myszczyszyn, Tobin 954 Kelly, Brad 943 Trynchuk, Dale 941 Deeg, Phil 929 Humberstone, Paul 921 Wong, Felix 907 Kerr, Chris 906 Simeon, Jamie 900 Moir, Zak 897 x, Mike 893 X, Daniel 892 Jordan, Darren 891 Wood, Greg 882 Daly, Ritchie 876 Spencer, Chad 873 Wilkins, Sam 844 Macdonald, Jon 843 Hodinski, Jasmine 839 Gibson, katy 838 Scaife, Darcy 829 Tse, Desmond 823 Volkman, Dallyn 814 Lehman, Blair 812 x, Tanveer 810 Hasiuk, Jody 805 Fester, David 801 Jackson, Dan 800 Jamerson, Rick 800 Campbell, Carmen 800 X, Uzair 800 |
Posted: Jan 14 2010 1:15AM
| ||
|
Points Clarification: Some people have asked how the points work lately and I just figured I would show an example of how it works, using myself as an example. Open Doubles from last week: Points at start of event: 1199.6 Partner: Wilkins, Ben (1026.2) vs: X, Uzair (800.0) Tanveer (887.3) Win Gain: 5.8 New Total points: 1205.3 Vs. Tse, Desmond (829.2) Dunn, Christian (1361.8) Win Gained: 15.8 New Points Total: 1221.1 Vs. Edwards, Simon (1118.2) Burgardt, Garry (1115.7) Gained: 16.1 New Points Total: 1237.2 vs. Luft, Carey (1012.0) McDonald, Tom (1151.7) Gained: 13.6 New Points Total: 1250.8 DYP from this week: Partner: Volkman, Dallyn (825.4) Vs. Kerr, Chris (908.2) Wilkins, Sam (845.7) Win Gained: 9.6 New Points Total: 1260.4 vs. Myszczyszyn, Tobin (893.8) Lawrence, Shane (1137.0) Win Gained: 15.4 New Points: 1275.9 Vs. Penner, Roger (1265.8) Burgardt, Garry (1118.9) Lost Points Lost: 10.5 New Points Total: 1265.3 Vs. Myszczyszyn, Tobin (931.6)Lawrence, Shane (1174.8) Lost Points Lost: 16.5 New Points Total: 1248.8 |
| ||
|
So... as you can see, when I won in games against teams that had a lot of points, I gained a lot more points. When I lost to teams that had a lot of points I didn't lose as many points as I did when I lost to teams with fewer points. If I had lost a game to two players that had less than 900 points, I would have lost a lot of points. So when you beat someone, you take there points. When you lose, they take yours. |
| ||
|
Any opinions on what we should do next week? Was thinking of mixing it up... Designated Pro/Am (Pro must play goalie for entire event) Handicapped DYP (not for points) Singles Pro Am BYP - players get to pick there partner, but pro must play with am any other suggestions? |
| ||
|
I like the idea of a designated pro am- do it as a dyp though. just my 2 cents |
| ||
|
I second that.  |
| ||
|
Two votes is enough for me (this time) Designated Pro/Am DYP Maybe next time we can come up with an event that has more titles.... |
| ||
|
Oh man my rating is in the bottom now  |
| ||
|
Oh man my rating is in the bottom now |
| ||
|
I wouldn't worry about that Uzzi. Your game has totally come a long ways lately and you will be a top "no-pro" in no time. |
| ||
|
Since I won't be there this Tuesday Feb 2 we will have to play the finals Tom & Des VS Chad & me next week Feb 9 hopefully. |
| ||
|
Oh so it's Chad and Garry that we're playing. Good to know. Congrats on beating Roger and Chris. I didn't know. Hopefully we'll get the final over with Feb 9th if we are all there. |
| ||
|
Actually they beat sam and ben, I think they beat rog and chris before that game. |
The last post to this thread is more than 30 days old.